Missouri Compromise

The second agree The moment Compromise, written by hydrogen stiff, attempted to limit the striverholding boundaries it was later declared unconstitutional and is as well as considered one of many events that led to the American Civil warfare. The compromise became a precedent for settling subsequent North and confederation disagreements over thraldom and duty issues, and it remained in effect until rescinded by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The atomic number 42 Compromise eased tensions surrounded by the North and the South delaying the civil war The American Civil War.However, it is also considered one of the causes of the civil war because it increased the component part of beliefs between the North and SouthThus, the atomic number 42 compromise played an important position in the development of the American Civil War. In February, 1819, the House of Representatives considered a bill authorizing the territory of molybdenum to frame a constitution. In the past, terri tories southwestward of the Mason Dixon Line had been automatically make into slave states. Most of second is northern of that line nonwithstanding many of its citizens were slaveholders.A bill to permit bondage in moment on a temporary basis, but prohibiting unless entry of slaves, passed the House but was rejected by the Senate. Meanwhile, Alabama had been admitted as a slave state, making the number of slave and free states 11 each. As this would ruin the balance between Slave states and Free states in the Senate, henry dust proposed the molybdenum compromise. The Missouri compromise was created in devote to ease tensions between the northern, anti- slavery states, and southern, pro-slavery, states for equal votes in the House of Representatives.It was used in maintaining balance in power between free and slave states, in an effort to preserve the balance of power in sexual intercourse between slave and free states, the Missouri Compromise was passed in 1820 admitting Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state. Henry Clay of Kentucky is known as the Great Compromiser. Clay served in some(prenominal) the Senate and the House of Representatives, where he was elected speaker of the house six times. foregoing to Clay holding the position, the speaker of the house had a minor role, but Clay shaped the speakership nto a very important and influential job. Clay received his nickname with his masterful negotiation of issues that threatened to tear the comparatively new country apart. Henry Clay grew up in Kentucky and equal Kentucky, which was a border state between the South and North, because of this Henry Clay was equal to relate to both the Norths and Souths beliefs on slavery. Since Henry Clay knew both sides of slavery he was able to act as an unbiased representative for the senate and was able to create the Missouri compromise without bias.The Missouri compromise included a solution to the controversy caused by Missouri wanting to b ecome a new slave state. Largely through the efforts of Henry Clay the amendment was accepted by the House. Missouri was authorized to submit a proslavery constitution and Maine was admitted to the Union. The Missouri constitution was presented to Congress for approval in 1821. It included a paragraph requiring the legislature to frustrate the immigration of free blacks into the state. The antislavery faction in Congress objected to this provision and a compromise bill, a good deal called the Second Missouri Compromise, was passed on March 2, 1821.This respect forbade Missouri to limit the rights guaranteed to all citizens by the federal government, meaning it could non ban the entry of free blacks into the state. Missouri was admitted on August 10, 1821, with the expulsion of Missouri, this law prohibited slavery in the Louisiana Territory north of the 36 30? latitude line. The Missouri compromise was successful for roughly 30 years. It provided a short-term solution to the problem and delayed the origination of the American Civil War.However, conditions in the United States undermined the Missouri compromise and made it difficult to be used. This plan was criticized by many southerners because it would establish a principle that Congress could make laws regarding slavery and the north felt it gave into slavery. In 1854, the Missouri Compromise was repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Three years later the Missouri Compromise was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott decision, which ruled that Congress did not have the authority to prohibit slavery in the territories.It is obvious that the Missouri Compromise could do nothing to close out the oncoming violence of the Civil War. This shows that although compromise is the preferable option it was not a viable option to prevent the American Civil War. The end between the North and South were far to numerous and significant to be satisfied by compromise. Sadly in human history it is often results so that it is only possible to resolve conflicts with violence.Missouri CompromiseMissouri CompromiseWithin American history, the events leading up to the Civil War tell an arouse story of the mindset of Northerners and Southerners at the time. One of the most fascinating questions to hash out is why the issue of admitting Missouri to the Union precipitated a major topic crisis and why the North and the South each agreed to the terms of the Missouri Compromise. First, the matter of admitting Missouri to the Union and the major national crisis it stirred.At the time that Missouri was seeking statehood, the number of free and slave states was equally split, and the admission of Missouri as a slave state would tip Congressional emolument in terms of the states toward those that were pro-slavery (Phillips, 2002). This issue threatened to divide the nation in a radical and violent way, but ultimately, this would not happen for most 40 more years and the onset of the Civil War. This was averted when the North and South each agreed to the terms of the Missouri Compromise, based on the yielding that Missouri made when the soon-to-be state agreed not to violate the federal Constitutional rights of any of its citizens in its state constitution. While the issue of slavery would eventually come to a boil, the Missouri Compromise held the peace for a time.ReferencesPhillips, C. (2002). The Crime against Missouri Slavery, Kansas, and the Cant of Southerners in the Border West. Civil War History, 48(1), 60+.