Nonviolent action takes low risk Essay

unprovoking pull through has been widely used in governmental and economical diverge that lot can use it to debateing for their true power of holder. This word is based on Merrimans article Agents of Change and Nonviolent(Merriman, 2008), Yunuss article The Role of the Corporation in patroniseing(a) Local Development (Yunus, 2000) and DuV wholes article Outside passel Liberation by People (DuVall, 2004)the unprovoking bring through is the trump sort to pile for fighting for the right of the economic and political. Moreover, it can remind the people that they argon the owner of the country and they are powerful enough to get into in national management.Different with the habitual impression of the mutation, which is al offices full phase of the moon of battle, violence and gore, the peaceable action costs less than the violent action and takes less risk based on mass supported. Hardy Merriman is older Adviser of the International Center on Nonviolent Conflict, in his article, Agents of change and unprovocative(Merriman, 2008), defines the main concept about nonviolent action nonviolent-action comes from discernment and obedience of people, what is the categories of nonviolent action, the reason why we reckon that the nonviolent action advance the violent action and he uses the U.S. Civil Right effort and Indian Independence Movement to explain the plan of the nonviolent action. Muhammad Yunus is economist and Nobel Peace Prize recipient in 2006.His article is focuses on special(prenominal) field that is the use of nonviolent in local development, which means corporation. It is a specific nonviolent way to make change. The article contrasts the charity way with the violent way to the sorry people to show us the vantage of nonviolent action. Jack DuVall is the founder of the International Center on Nonviolent. His article uses two examples, Lincoln and Gandhi, to elicit nine characters of a successful nonviolent action. The action shoul d have a darling attracter with clear goals, radiate the scope of the movement, good analysis of the revolutionary situation, good risk-averse, persist the nonviolent way, courage from the enemy disintegrate, good manage of the material supply, compressive strength and position for the challenge. For the trio articles, there are 2 similarities among them the first is that they all recognition the requirement of the successful nonviolent action.For the first article, Agents of Change and Nonviolent proceeding, Merriman refers that the successful nonviolent action should have an outstanding leader, who has benevolence. Even the leader should formulate a complete programme that can attract people to unite. The key role of the leader and the programme has been emphasized, that is same of the article, Outside suasion Liberation by the People, which lists the nine categories of the leader clear goals, widen the scope of the movement, good analysis of the revolutionary situation, good risk-averse, persist the nonviolent way, courage from the enemy disintegrate, good manage of the material supply, compressive strength and wide awake for the challenge. From the background of these two authors, we can find out that both of them are in the International Center on Nonviolent and both of them mention that we should focus on that the successful nonviolent action should have the good leader and comprehensive plan.Even the good leaders have whatsoever of the categories above that they are kind-hearted, have a good starting top that respect interests of the masses, if they use the violent way to make the change, the action whitewash take more risks than the nonviolent action. That is the second similarity that both of three articles menti unmatchabled. For the first article, Merriman states that the violence action is base on using the force, and all the money and right concentrate on the leader and the only one way can restrict him is the rule. While, if he did n ot obey the rule, it testament make the disaster result. On the contrary, nonviolent actions not only enumerate people that they are powerful, they demonstrate peoples power by setting clear, achievable objectives and then documenting and publicizing their victories. (Merriman, 2008)That means the successful revolution cannot separate from the masses and take less risk by getting all people involve decision-making. As the social problems, like destitution issues, we should use the charity way that give the poor enough opportunities and that ordain get unimaginable feedback, from the second article, The Role of the Corporation in Supporting Local Development. As the political aspect, DuVall, in his Outside take care Liberation by the People, has mentioned that dictatorship and terrorism regime should be overthrown, while we should not counter violence with violence, and we should use the nonviolent movements to fight for our rights.Because it takes less risk that it can avoid r epeating the violence regime. In summary, base on the 3 articles written by Merriman, Yunus and DuVall, the nonviolent is the best way to people to fight for the right. From the economical aspects, it makes the profit maximization that poor people can get loan from the corporation to striving their lives and from the political aspects, mass people can participate in elaborating the formulation. Also with the support from the masses and the correct leadership of the good leader, the nonviolent action pass on take less risk than the violent action.ReferenceMerriman, H. (2008, April 8). Agents of Change and Nonviolent Action. Conservation Biology, 22(2).Yunus, M. (2000). The Role of the Corporation in Supporting Local Development. Reflections, 9(2).DuVall, J. (2004, kinfolk 22). Outside view Liberation by the People. United Press International.